Tom Hanks Bristles at Comparisons to James Stewart

In the world of cinema, it’s almost inevitable that actors will be measured against their predecessors, no matter how distinctive their approach. For some, being likened to a legend is a compliment. For Tom Hanks, however, the comparison is rather awkward. Throughout the 1990s, Hanks was a fixture on the big screen, collecting back-to-back Academy Awards for his roles in both a hard-hitting legal drama and a heartwarming tale of an extraordinary life. These performances showcased his considerable range, building on earlier successes from the previous decade. Whether lending his voice to an animated cowboy or leading a major wartime epic, Hanks became a household name, known for his affable on-screen presence and carefully chosen roles.

He consistently opted for parts that cemented his reputation as a reliable leading man, steering clear of projects that might jeopardise his standing. This calculated approach paid off, ensuring his enduring popularity and status as a go-to figure in mainstream cinema.

Uncomfortable Parallels

At the height of his fame, Hanks frequently found himself compared to James Stewart, a classic figure in Hollywood celebrated for his relatable, everyman charm. Yet, Hanks doesn’t see this as a flattering parallel. In fact, he considers it a slight—though not towards himself. He feels it diminishes Stewart’s legacy, suggesting that while he might have managed in some of Stewart’s roles, he doubts he could have matched the same intensity or nuance, particularly in more complex films.

There’s a certain artistry in Stewart’s work, especially in collaborations with directors known for their distinctive style. Hanks himself admits he would struggle to bring the same qualities to some of Stewart’s most challenging roles. He once remarked,

“I get embarrassed every time that comes up. Jimmy was the best of all time. Comparing the two of us is like an insult to him, because, frankly, I’m lucky to be where I am. I’m just this really cheesy guy,”

making it clear he holds Stewart in the highest regard.

Preferring Modest Comparisons

Rather than being set alongside a Hollywood icon, Hanks would rather be likened to actors who, while respected, never quite reached the same legendary status. He’s even suggested that being compared to Van Johnson would be more fitting, though he’s quick to question whether that might be unfair to Johnson as well. Hanks added,

“Would that be considered an insult to Van? Should I be comparing myself to John Agar? Maybe that’s more appropriate. I just get uncomfortable when I’m asked to talk about myself. There are a lot more talented actors out there.”

His humility is evident, as he downplays his own achievements and deflects attention towards others in the industry. It’s a trait that has perhaps contributed to his enduring appeal, both on and off the screen.

Shared Qualities, Distinct Legacies

Whether or not one believes Hanks matches Stewart’s talent, it’s easy to see why the comparison arises. Both have cultivated a trustworthy, likeable image that has drawn audiences to their films time and again. Each has taken on darker roles, yet their reputations remain largely untarnished, maintaining their status as beloved figures in the industry.

Still, as Hanks himself points out, the technical differences between the two are significant. Stewart, in his view, possessed a versatility and edge that set him apart, making any direct comparison rather unfair. Ultimately, both men have left an indelible mark on cinema, but Hanks is adamant that Stewart’s artistry stands alone.