Stephen King’s Cell: How a Star-Studded Apocalypse Flopped
Stephen King’s chilling vision of a world undone by mobile phones inspired Cell, a film adaptation with Samuel L. Jackson that failed to impress. Discover what went wrong with this apocalyptic thriller.
Stephen King’s 2006 novel Cell stands as one of his most unsettling explorations of the end of civilisation. The story centres on a New England artist’s desperate journey to find his son after a mysterious signal, broadcast through the world’s mobile networks, transforms ordinary people into violent, unthinking predators. The premise is as chilling as it is timely, reflecting anxieties about technology’s grip on modern life.
Origins of a Modern Nightmare
King’s inspiration for Cell came from a moment of idle observation. He once described stepping out of a hotel in New York and noticing a woman on her phone. He imagined a scenario where she received an irresistible message, compelling her to commit acts of violence until someone stopped her. He mused on the consequences if such a phenomenon spread globally, remarking,
Normal people would see this, and the first thing they would do would be to call their friends and families on their cell phones. So the epidemic would spread like poison ivy.
Further inspiration struck when King saw a well-dressed man apparently talking to himself on the street, only to realise he was using a wireless earpiece. King reflected,
Then, later, I was walking down the street and I see some guy who is apparently a crazy person yelling to himself. And I want to cross the street to get away from him. Except he’s not a bum; he’s dressed in a suit. Then I see he’s got one of these plugs in his ear and he’s talking into his cell phone. And I thought to myself, I really want to write this story.
From Page to Screen: A Troubled Transition
Cell was adapted for the screen a decade after the novel’s release, with Tod Williams at the helm and a cast led by Samuel L. Jackson, John Cusack, Isabelle Fuhrman, and Stacy Keach. Despite the pedigree, the film struggled to capture the novel’s tension and depth. Released in 2016, it managed a mere $1.3 million at the box office and was met with a dismal 11% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics were united in their disappointment, suggesting the adaptation failed to do justice to its source material.
The film’s production history was not without its own drama. Originally, Eli Roth was set to direct, but he was replaced by Williams. The screenplay was co-written by King himself alongside Adam Alleca. The plot follows artist Clay Riddell as he navigates a devastated landscape, searching for his son while evading the so-called “phoners”—those driven mad by the Pulse.
What Went Wrong with Cell?
Despite a cast brimming with talent, the adaptation was widely criticised for its muddled pacing and confusing narrative. The editing was choppy, and character arcs felt underdeveloped. The film’s strong premise was lost amid a barrage of clichés, and the emotional core of the story was undermined by a poorly executed ending. Many felt the film missed an opportunity to make better use of Jackson’s considerable screen presence.
While Cell failed to resonate with audiences, King’s fascination with post-apocalyptic themes has continued to find success elsewhere, with adaptations such as The Long Walk and Running Man receiving more favourable attention. For those curious, Cell is currently available to stream on Prime Video in the United States.