Celebrities

John Lithgow Says J.K. Rowling's Trans Views Are Misrepresented

John Lithgow Says J.K. Rowling's Trans Views Are Misrepresented
Image credit: Legion-Media

The actor hasn’t met the author, but he has a verdict on some of her views: inexplicable.

Well, it wouldn’t be a new Harry Potter project without the usual elephant in the room: anything associated with J.K. Rowling tends to spark debate (and for good reason). The anti-trans comments from Rowling over the years have made quite a few people side-eye anything happening in the Wizarding World—even if HBO’s upcoming Harry Potter series is full of young, mostly unknown actors.

But if you’ve been following casting news, you probably noticed one extremely recognizable name in the lineup: John Lithgow, who’s set to play Dumbledore. That's the veteran actor from 3rd Rock from the Sun, The Crown, and basically any prestige TV show you can name. He’s by far the biggest get for this series, and, not surprisingly, the politics around Rowling gave him pause.

John Lithgow’s Decision: Not So Simple

Earlier this month, Lithgow was surprisingly candid with The New York Times about his internal debate. He admitted that sticking his name on the Potter franchise might mean explaining his choice for, well, pretty much the rest of time. But, as he told them, that wasn’t enough to make him walk away.

Fast forward to his appearance on The New Yorker Radio Hour, and Lithgow goes into even more detail. How he describes it:

'There was everything attractive about the job, and job security into my late years. You don’t ignore those issues ... The whole subject of Rowling’s imputed prejudice, it came up after everything was already underway. I’d already said yes [...] I was urged to walk away, and I was not about to do that.'

To translate:

  • He got approached for the role and said yes.
  • After his name was already attached, the whole Rowling controversy flared up (again).
  • People in his circles lobbied for him to back out, but he decided, nope, he was in.

Lithgow did admit he hasn’t actually met Rowling in person, and while he disagrees with quite a bit of what she’s said, he believes, 'much of it I think has been twisted and misrepresented, and she has doubled down on it at her own cost.' So, he’s definitely not totally Team Rowling, but he doesn’t put all the blame for the backlash solely on her shoulders either.

Why Take This Gig?

Honestly, Lithgow is pretty open about why he stuck around: It’s a good gig, especially for a guy at his stage in life who’s looking for work with some staying power. He admits the controversy will follow him, but clearly, he thinks the upsides outweigh the inevitable social media firefights.

At the end of the day, Lithgow weighed the pros (job security, iconic character, let’s be real—probably a fat paycheck) against the cons (constant questions about Rowling, his own disagreements with her views), and decided to keep his wand. His basic logic: the reasons to take the job 'were much, much stronger than the reasons to protest.'

HBO hasn’t gone deep into the rest of the casting or the show’s direction yet. But betting on Lithgow for Dumbledore is a strong signal they want this show to be more than just a nostalgia cash grab—they want names who bring both gravitas and, apparently, a willingness to wade through some headline-making controversy.

In short: Lithgow’s in, controversy or not. And if you thought the Wizarding World was going to fade quietly back into pop culture, well, don’t hold your breath.