Movies

The Social Reckoning headed for a box-office flop to rival Tom Cruise’s Digger

The Social Reckoning headed for a box-office flop to rival Tom Cruise’s Digger
Image credit: Google Veo 3

Early reviews, per Deadline, have The Social Reckoning headed for a box-office splat to rival Tom Cruise’s Digger — but there’s a wrinkle that could change the financial picture.

If you thought The Social Reckoning was lining up to be a box office heavy-hitter, you might want to lower those expectations. Early numbers and reviews are painting a rather muted picture for Aaron Sorkin’s sequel to The Social Network, and there’s a rather interesting comparison brewing with another underwhelming release – Tom Cruise’s Digger. But before you write this one off as just another bomb, there’s a twist in the tale when it comes to the financial side.

The Social Reckoning lands in cinemas on 9 October 2026, right in the middle of a crowded awards-bait season.

Low Opening, But With a Catch

The current word from industry trackers (via Deadline) is that The Social Reckoning is looking at what they call a 'mid-single-digit' opening across 2,200 theatres in the US. Translate that into actual money, and you’re probably looking at something around the $8 million mark for its opening weekend – give or take. Coincidentally, that’s almost identical to the lacklustre debut for Digger, which scraped up just $8 million out of the gate, even with Tom Cruise plastered all over the posters and a major studio push behind it.

Now, on paper, these are equally grim numbers for both films. But here’s where things get genuinely interesting: Digger allegedly cost a jaw-dropping $160 million to make. In contrast, The Social Reckoning’s budget reportedly sits in a much more sensible $30–42 million range, not counting the extra it might spend to market the thing worldwide. On top of that, Alcon helped co-finance the Sorkin sequel, spreading out the risk in a way Digger never managed.

  • The Social Reckoning: Approx. $30–42 million production budget (excluding marketing/prints), with Alcon sharing the load
  • Digger: About $160 million sunk into production alone, no co-financing to soften the blow

So while both films might look like duds based on ticket sales, only one of them is a complete financial catastrophe. If you’re keeping score, just remember – how much you spend is a lot harder to claw back than a modest opening weekend.

What’s Actually in the Sequel?

Sorkin is back as both writer and director for The Social Reckoning, picking up in a very different social media landscape. This time, Facebook isn’t just a fresh-faced start-up full of college kids, it’s the all-powerful behemoth we know (and maybe loathe) today. The film takes inspiration from real events: the whistleblowing saga of Frances Haugen, a Facebook engineer who went public with the platform’s darkest secrets. She teamed up with Jeff Horwitz, a Wall Street Journal reporter, setting off the revelations now known as the Facebook Files.

Jeremy Strong (the bloke from Succession) has stepped into the role of a now middle-aged Mark Zuckerberg. He’s joined by Mikey Madison, Jeremy Allen White, Wunmi Mosaku, Betty Gilpin, Billy Magnussen, and Bill Burr – a rather eclectic mix if you ask me.

What’s the Early Buzz?

If you pay any attention to Rotten Tomatoes (I usually do, with a pinch of salt), The Social Reckoning is currently holding a 63% Tomatometer with 70 reviews logged. That’s certainly not a disaster, but it’s far from another critical darling for Sorkin.

CineCorner UK use of cookies We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. These will be set only if you accept. For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookie Policy